Categorized | Web Design

Fluid width, or fixed width? The debate…

Posted on 25 September 2006 by Lara Kulpa

Okay, so quite often I find myself in the midst of a discussion about screen resolutions and web site display widths. The screen resolution is the setting of each individual person who uses a computer, and based almost solely on their own preferences. (Of course, sometimes, you run into a person who doesn’t even know that they can change their screen resolution, why they’d want to, or much less, how…)


On most modern computers (yes, this is important… “modern”), the screen resolution options range from 800×600 pixels all the way up to 1280×1024 pixels. The first number relates to the width, the second to the height. The (somewhat unfortunate) thing is that by default, many systems come with the lower-resolution 800×600 - which makes viewing designs that are specific for higher resolutions pretty annoying, as you’ll have to use the scrollbar at the bottom of the window to see everything…

(Information on changing your screen resolution settings in Windows XP or Windows 98)

My personal preference? My settings are at 1024×768, and you’ll find that the majority of people who are familiar with the benefits of a higher screen resolution will have this setting - some go even higher, but again, it’s personal preference.

So here’s the thing about designing for resolutions: If you already have a website and a good stats tracker, and you know for a fact that the majority of your site visitors use 800×600 screen resolution, then by all means, design a fixed 800-pixel wide site for that crowd. (Example: Sites that are built for residents living in countries with less than “modern” levels of technology, or sites that are designed for those with visual impairments.)

However if you’re not sure, or if there’s an even balance, my vote will always lay with the fluid width design scheme. Fluid widths will automatically resize based on the end user’s display settings (screen resolution) and in almost all cases, you’ll find that the site will look fantastic on any computer with any screen resolution setting.

If you’re stubborn though, and you want to stick to a fixed width layout, please limit yourself to no wider than 800 pixels, including any and all padding, margins, and borders. Even the slightest scrollbar at the bottom of a browser window is unsightly and annoying. Oh, and don’t forget to make the background color or image flattering, if not interesting… us “1024 users” really can’t stand a site that has a black background for the content, with big white borders on either side. It’d be much nicer to see all black, or all white, or what have you!


Here’s an example of an 800×600 layout:
(click image to view on full screen - you may have to click the image again to get it to full size when it opens in a new window, regardless of your resolution settings)

800x600.jpg

Now, here’s that SAME layout, but fixed, and inside a 1024×768 resolution monitor (the yellow space is there to represent the default background color - it’s NOT a recommendation! ;) ):
(note, if your settings are at 800×600, you will have to “magnify” the image and then you’ll see that “scroll effect” at the bottom of your screen - again, you may have to click the image again to get it to full size when it opens in a new window, regardless of your resolution settings)

1024x768.jpg

Popularity: 57% [?]

 

4 Comments For This Post

  1. Andy Says:

    What about maintaining the integrity of a design and formatting by using a fixed width? Is it better to use a fixed width for design continuity? Great site!

  2. Lara Kulpa Says:

    Hi Andy - Thanks for the comment and for your email! ;)

    This post is one of the older ones here on the site, and as you can tell by this site’s design/layout, we’re built fixed for wider than 800×600. :D The times change, eh? lol

    That said, I still think it’s important to take a look at your audience or target audience when making this decision. If I thought that most of the people coming to this site would have resolutions of 800×600 ONLY, then I’d have made the minimum width narrower and likely fluid.

    Put it this way, you could design a fantastic fixed 1200+ wide layout that looks gorgeous. But if your target mainly uses 1024, then they’re missing out on over 200 pixels of your site unless they do the horizontal scroll… and no one likes that!

  3. Andy Says:

    Yes, times do change and they change fast. Thanks for the reply.

  4. Aurelius Tjin Says:

    Thanks for the information. I really needed this one. :)

Leave a Reply

Advertise Here
Advertise Here